PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ENPH's 33.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.03%
Cost growth less than half of ENPH's 32.87%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
153.10%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 35.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
142.39%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.12%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 12.67%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1.40%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ENPH's 5.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.18%
Total costs growth less than half of ENPH's 25.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.85%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 15.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
272.70%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 63.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
237.84%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 22.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
156.30%
Similar operating income growth to ENPH's 144.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
144.93%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 82.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
202.96%
Other expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
217.58%
Similar pre-tax income growth to ENPH's 260.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
193.85%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 168.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
4.67%
Tax expense growth less than half of ENPH's 69.83%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
235.37%
Similar net income growth to ENPH's 284.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
208.05%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 186.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
234.92%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 200.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
219.05%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ENPH's 300.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.53%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 5.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
17.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ENPH's 12.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.