PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Revenue growth below 50% of ENPH's 34.28%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.70%
Cost growth less than half of ENPH's 29.94%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 42.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.33%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 15.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.45%
G&A growth less than half of ENPH's 15.29%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 12.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.40%
Total costs growth less than half of ENPH's 25.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-45.63%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 69.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 124.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 67.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 93.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 43.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.14%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 62.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-110.21%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 179.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 108.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.36%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 192.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.33%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 118.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.94%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 177.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 187.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 7.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 2.20% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.