PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-60.64%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 3.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-47.09%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 5.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.37%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 6.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-6.94%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 17.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.46%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 11.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.12%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 37.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.46%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 49.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-103.52%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 29.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.74%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 3.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2402.01%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 0.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3194.16%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 2.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.14%
Other expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 58938.10%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-102.52%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 28.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 31.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.09%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 83.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-126.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-135.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-127.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.75%
Share count reduction below 50% of ENPH's 0.73%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ENPH's 3.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.