PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.36%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 13.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.80%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 25.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-33.63%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-25.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
53.13%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 38.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 56.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.38%
Other expenses growth less than half of ENPH's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-10.96%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 43.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 29.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.56%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 24.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.99%
D&A growth less than half of ENPH's 24.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-134.75%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-138.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-113.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-112.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-127.74%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-111.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-113.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.98%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-113.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.55%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 3.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-14.46%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 0.31% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.