PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.76%
Revenue growth below 50% of ENPH's 11.22%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.49%
Cost growth 50-75% of ENPH's 12.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-2.26%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 9.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.77%
R&D reduction while ENPH shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
Operating expenses reduction while ENPH shows 50.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.25%
Total costs growth less than half of ENPH's 22.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-22.01%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.36%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 9.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
749.32%
EBITDA growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
710.71%
EBITDA margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.21%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-261.33%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-212.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-206.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.53%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-212.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-207.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-213.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-225.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.14%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.