PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-38.74%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 5.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.89%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 4.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
30.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x ENPH's 14.99%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ENPH's 3.99%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.47%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.05%
D&A growth above 1.5x ENPH's 3.64%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-259.08%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 6.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.44%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 7.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.01%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 6.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-301.93%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.28%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 0.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-954.79%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 6.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1064.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 6.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
142.96%
Tax expense growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 122.53%. Bill Ackman would demand explanation.
-817.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-909.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-825.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-825.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 0.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.