1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-55.26%
Revenue decline while ENPH shows 15.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.59%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 12.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-139.07%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 19.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-187.33%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 3.56% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.64%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-50.23%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.46%
Total costs reduction while ENPH shows 3.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.87%
Interest expense reduction while ENPH shows 1.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.84%
D&A reduction while ENPH shows 1.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-98.23%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 116.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-343.07%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 388.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.85%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 110.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.28%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 109.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.54%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.75%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 197.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-223.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 184.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Tax expense growth while ENPH reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-65.77%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 167.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-270.51%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 158.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 166.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 166.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
149.04%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
149.04%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ENPH's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.