PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.24%
Similar revenue growth to ENPH's 25.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
61.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x ENPH's 19.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-253.92%
Gross profit decline while ENPH shows 33.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-187.18%
Margin decline while ENPH shows 6.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.39%
G&A growth while ENPH reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
254.97%
Marketing expense growth while ENPH reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Operating expenses growth while ENPH reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.87%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ENPH's 10.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.60%
Similar interest expense growth to ENPH's 0.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-7.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-571.02%
EBITDA decline while ENPH shows 211.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-444.47%
EBITDA margin decline while ENPH shows 148.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-215.67%
Operating income decline while ENPH shows 1576.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-156.14%
Operating margin decline while ENPH shows 1235.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-994.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-461.78%
Pre-tax income decline while ENPH shows 352.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-355.84%
Pre-tax margin decline while ENPH shows 260.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while ENPH shows 1200.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-390.49%
Net income decline while ENPH shows 322.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-297.99%
Net margin decline while ENPH shows 236.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-296.15%
EPS decline while ENPH shows 325.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-296.15%
Diluted EPS decline while ENPH shows 314.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while ENPH shows 2.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.