PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.14%
Cost reduction while ENPH shows 1.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.73%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.25%
Margin expansion while ENPH shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
G&A reduction while ENPH shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-9.11%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.28%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-69.67%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
104.85%
Operating income growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.19%
Operating margin growth while ENPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-89.65%
Other expenses reduction while ENPH shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Similar tax expense growth to ENPH's 127.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-82.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.32%
Share count increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
115.49%
Diluted share increase while ENPH reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.