PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
131.08%
Revenue growth 50-75% of FSLR's 240.06%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
47.11%
Cost growth of 47.11% while FSLR maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
51.20%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSLR's 240.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
78.88%
Margin change of 78.88% while FSLR shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-33.32%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while FSLR maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.37%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
25.45%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
100.00%
Interest expense change of 100.00% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
92.71%
D&A change of 92.71% while FSLR maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
74.59%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FSLR's 142.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
89.00%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to FSLR's 112.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
55.54%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 142.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
80.76%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of FSLR's 112.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-193.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.41%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSLR's 105.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.89%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.86%
Net income growth below 50% of FSLR's 105.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
63.16%
Net margin growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1378.57%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 103.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1378.57%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 103.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.15%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 12.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-94.15%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 13.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.