PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
33.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 18.16%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
49.43%
Cost growth of 49.43% while FSLR maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-13.81%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 18.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-35.66%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-59.76%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
251.24%
Operating expenses change of 251.24% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
143.86%
Total costs change of 143.86% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
486.93%
D&A change of 486.93% while FSLR maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
604.90%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
476.91%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.34%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.84%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
713.06%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 379.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-18.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.74%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.69%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.50%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.50%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.12%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 0.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-16.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.