PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
91.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 27.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
95.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 36.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
78.70%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 17.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.51%
R&D growth less than half of FSLR's 85.45%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
191.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 40.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
107.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSLR's 38.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 38.53%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
29.79%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-32.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-113.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-111.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-481.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-89.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.95%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 28.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
14.76%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 29.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.