PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.07%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 15.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
30.98%
Similar cost growth to FSLR's 32.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-8.12%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.92%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 23.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.26%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSLR's 14.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-21.12%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.95%
D&A growth less than half of FSLR's 17.65%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-97.51%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 20.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.96%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 17.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-437.48%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 20.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-340.30%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 4.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-856.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-683.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.09%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-531.05%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 783.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-453.11%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 665.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 771.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 728.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.34%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-5.06%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.92% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.