PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 26.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.58%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 16.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.85%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FSLR's 35.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
28.33%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 7.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-149.74%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 15.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.33%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 10.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 4.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
40.41%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FSLR's 76.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.66%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 23.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
64.97%
Similar operating income growth to FSLR's 62.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
72.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 28.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-226.15%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 47.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 60.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 27.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.73%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSLR's 205.53%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-42.17%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 36.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 37.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 39.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.93%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.