PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.00%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
24.40%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 3.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.01%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
339.16%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 7.40%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-32.00%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.16%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 33.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
18.67%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.73%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 11.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
32.20%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.36%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.22%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.55%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-28.06%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
146.08%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.71%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
162.24%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
144.76%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 5.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 4.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.