PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.22%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 24.36%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-147.33%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 30.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
401.45%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 19.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
372.11%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-126.33%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 11.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.53%
Similar operating expenses growth to FSLR's 11.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
6.63%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 24.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
30.42%
Similar D&A growth to FSLR's 32.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
15.34%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FSLR's 22.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.59%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.07%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 23.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.84%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 248.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.25%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 28.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.85%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 3.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.78%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 14.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.72%
Net income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 33.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
12.72%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 7.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-40.00%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 34.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.93%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.