PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-48.11%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-62.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.19%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 13.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-67.25%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while FSLR maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
128.20%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-43.53%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.75%
Interest expense change of 48.75% while FSLR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-11.34%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 11.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-88.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-205.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-507.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-101.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-8.75%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.