PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.29%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.53%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.22%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.55%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
39.51%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.93%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 820.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
34.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 6.49%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
44.68%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 7.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.93%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.04%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 5.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.48%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 5.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.21%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 89.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.29%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.24%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.24%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
14.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.