PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.79%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
26.53%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
35.11%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-25.47%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-31.19%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.34%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 9.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.97%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
33.93%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
91.25%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.65%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.67%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.22%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.95%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 445.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
57.11%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.20%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-67.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
62.22%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.66%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.30%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.30%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.94%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.