PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-18.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
81.85%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
100.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 20.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.03%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-11.49%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.00%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.48%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
829.35%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
903.89%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.05%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
246.64%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.54%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
113.24%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
114.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.75%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 5.92%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
135.77%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
139.43%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
134.78%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
132.61%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 2.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
12.03%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 1.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.