PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
9.40%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-32.38%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.88%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 9.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
20.40%
G&A change of 20.40% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.48%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 5.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.93%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.07%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of FSLR's 7.88%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-53.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 149.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-86.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-85.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
296.39%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.76%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.