PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.49%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 63.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
33.96%
Cost growth 50-75% of FSLR's 55.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
15.26%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSLR's 104.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.67%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 24.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.28%
R&D growth less than half of FSLR's 15.11%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-4.34%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.51%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 16.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.56%
Total costs growth 50-75% of FSLR's 48.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.27%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.08%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.78%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSLR's 130.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 1420.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
233.84%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 4289.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
155.83%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 2587.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.24%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
181.41%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSLR's 3342.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
162.39%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 2007.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
127.15%
Net income growth below 50% of FSLR's 1852.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
74.07%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 1095.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
118.18%
EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 1660.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
122.22%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 2075.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.90%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.