PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-62.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-61.31%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-65.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.85%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
3.64%
G&A change of 3.64% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.46%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.17%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-92.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.48%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-121.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-158.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-107.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.05%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-108.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.49%
Share count increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.53%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.