PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.24%
Similar revenue growth to FSLR's 10.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
13.75%
Cost growth 50-75% of FSLR's 26.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-19.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.96%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-13.40%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.04%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.25%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 22.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.30%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 54.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.89%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.02%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.24%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.25%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.68%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.83%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.99%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.99%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.74%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.74%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.64%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.