PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
73.47%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
58.28%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
212.90%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
80.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 32.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.37%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-5.45%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
43.73%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.35%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.62%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
73.83%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.91%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 32.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
86.36%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 899.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
92.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 1257.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-192.16%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 252.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.10%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSLR's 658.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
59.70%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 930.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.03%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.07%
Net income growth below 50% of FSLR's 1049.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
66.61%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 1461.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.14%
EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 1046.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.14%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 1046.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 1.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.