PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.52%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
76.12%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-124.82%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.25%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-16.93%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.49%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 7.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
61.97%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.41%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.98%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.76%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-2230.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1558.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2818.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1977.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
83.06%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-368.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-233.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-235.61%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 277.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-578.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-382.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-586.21%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-586.21%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.