PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-67.89%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 85.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-59.32%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 93.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-214.64%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 32.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-879.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.02%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.33%
G&A change of 1.33% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-52.59%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 70.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.54%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 188.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-19.70%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.44%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSLR's 106.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-129.10%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 161.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.95%
Operating income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 98.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-49.64%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 99.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.51%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 311.57%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
51.02%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-52.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 101.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
121.25%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.12%
Net income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-52.23%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 100.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.26%
EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 101.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.