PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.34%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-25.07%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
105.72%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 31.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
105.74%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 88.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1.93%
G&A change of 1.93% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 9.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.67%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.70%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
73.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 33.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
73.01%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of FSLR's 109.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.08%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 274.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
45.90%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 349.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-424.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.06%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.85%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.28%
Net income growth below 50% of FSLR's 469.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.04%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 714.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.93%
EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 455.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.93%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 455.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.