PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
35.46%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
44.94%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-171.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.20%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 13.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
6.03%
G&A change of 6.03% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 17.91%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
38.30%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.19%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 46.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.71%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2510.65%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1827.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-930.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-660.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.83%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 12.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-653.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-456.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.41%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSLR's 5160.75%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-948.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-673.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-946.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-943.59%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.