PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 2.22%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.97%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 8.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-177.61%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-29.30%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 23.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.12%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSLR's 10.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.34%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 258.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.76%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 20.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.87%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.93%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.06%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-371.19%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 658.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-65.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-327.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-76.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.