PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 9.96%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.03%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
153.10%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSLR's 68812.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
142.39%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSLR's 62571.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.12%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 11.51%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1.40%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 11.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.18%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.85%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 2.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
272.70%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FSLR's 372.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
237.84%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 100.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
156.30%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 88.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
144.93%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 89.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
202.96%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
217.58%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 90.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
193.85%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 91.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.67%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSLR's 942.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
235.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 72.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
208.05%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 75.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
234.92%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 71.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
219.05%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 71.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.53%
Share count increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.