1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-60.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.37%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 0.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-6.94%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.46%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 0.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.12%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 122.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.46%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 1.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-103.52%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 291.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2402.01%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 101.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3194.16%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 103.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.14%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-102.52%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 101.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 104.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.09%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-126.30%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 252.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-135.35%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 501.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-121.25%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 253.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 251.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.75%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.