PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.38%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.20%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
102.35%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
62.68%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-38.72%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
48.07%
G&A change of 48.07% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 18.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.79%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.79%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-78.48%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1259.49%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1032.20%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
174.48%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 55.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
194.72%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
824.29%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
643.11%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 13.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
830.77%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.81%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.