PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.36%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.80%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 37.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-33.63%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 15.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-25.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
53.13%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.38%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSLR's 357.64%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-10.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 27.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
10.99%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 5.96%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-134.75%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 44.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.77%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 50.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-105.75%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 336.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.42%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 231.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-113.09%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 161.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-112.68%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 396.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.15%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 276.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.74%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 170.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-111.73%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 81.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-113.09%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 37.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.98%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 81.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-113.46%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 81.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.55%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-14.46%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.