PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.82%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 55.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
26.32%
Cost growth 50-75% of FSLR's 44.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-14.41%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 97.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.97%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 27.24% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
46.53%
R&D growth above 1.5x FSLR's 17.52%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.56%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
32.11%
Similar total costs growth to FSLR's 38.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
29.24%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
138.43%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
575.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 101.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
468.74%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 114.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-285.20%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 240.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-255.87%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 118.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
160.29%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
136.08%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 263.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
130.36%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to FSLR's 133.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
565.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSLR's 4176.70%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
123.94%
Net income growth 50-75% of FSLR's 190.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
120.15%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 86.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
124.49%
EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 188.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
124.49%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of FSLR's 192.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.69%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.