PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.27%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 69.18%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
20.98%
Cost growth less than half of FSLR's 81.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.71%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.80%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 80.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 8.68%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.23%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 69.07%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
27.90%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 12.95%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
159.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.06%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-185.68%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 347.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-139.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.19%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 342.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.47%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 243.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-172.02%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 322.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 231.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
133.47%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSLR's 529.76%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-91.84%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 229.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.85%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 176.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.47%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 226.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.47%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 226.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.33%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 1.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.