PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.87%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 1.28%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.11%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
29.38%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSLR's 190.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSLR's 189.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.39%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 15.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.51%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 23.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.04%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.54%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-39.89%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 1.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
945.34%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
842.38%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
150.57%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
144.41%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
786.94%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 227.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
473.61%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
428.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.26%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
314.88%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
288.71%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
316.67%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.66%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.