PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-38.74%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 84.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.89%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 237.97% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
30.34%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.47%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.05%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-259.08%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 29.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.44%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 29162.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.01%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 160.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-301.93%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 210.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-954.79%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 642.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1064.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 1092.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
142.96%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-817.67%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 663.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-909.53%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 1130.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 664.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 664.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.56%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.