PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.13%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 44.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1784.74%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSLR's 54.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-56.88%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 33.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-47.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.23%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1401.26%
G&A change of 1401.26% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-12.39%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.11%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.27%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 45.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.60%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 89.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6953.88%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 7.19%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
64.53%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 25.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
57.20%
EBITDA margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.93%
Operating income decline while FSLR shows 45.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.89%
Operating margin decline while FSLR shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.17%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
55.33%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 29.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.13%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 24.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
26.00%
Similar net income growth to FSLR's 30.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.70%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-294.44%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 30.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.35%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 30.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.