PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.24%
Positive growth while FSLR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
61.46%
Cost increase while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-253.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-187.18%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 2.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.39%
G&A change of 195.39% while FSLR maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
254.97%
Marketing expense change of 254.97% while FSLR maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSLR's 30.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
153.87%
Total costs growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.60%
Interest expense growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.29%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 14.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-571.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-444.47%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 2.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-215.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-994.87%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 15.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-461.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-355.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-390.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-297.99%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 1.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.35%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.