PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.73%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.25%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSLR's 8.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-9.11%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 11.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.28%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 27228.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-69.67%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.49%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 38.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
104.85%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.19%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-89.65%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 59.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-82.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
115.49%
Diluted share increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.