PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.07%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
30.98%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-8.12%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-24.73%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.92%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.26%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.95%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-97.51%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.96%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-437.48%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-340.30%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.85%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-856.90%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-683.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.09%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-531.05%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-453.11%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.89%
Share count change of 1.89% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-5.06%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.