PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.58%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
22.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.33%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MAXN's 51.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-149.74%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.33%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.41%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MAXN's 72.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.66%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to MAXN's 49.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
64.97%
Similar operating income growth to MAXN's 66.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
72.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 39.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-226.15%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.73%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.17%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.93%
Share count reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.