1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.37%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.16%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
13.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of MAXN's 51.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.68%
R&D growth above 1.5x MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.54%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.03%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.81%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.37%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.37%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MAXN's 72.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 49.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.86%
Operating income growth below 50% of MAXN's 66.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.51%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MAXN's 39.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-567.55%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.74%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MAXN's 70.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.15%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 46.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
187.05%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.79%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.68%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.62%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.33%
Share count change of 1.33% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.