PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.67%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
57.81%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
56.16%
Similar gross profit growth to MAXN's 73.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.33%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.39%
R&D growth above 1.5x MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
6.07%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Other expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.08%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.01%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.35%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.62%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
634.58%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 72.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
368.88%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 49.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
482.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 66.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
344.19%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 39.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-93.32%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.82%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of MAXN's 70.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
272.18%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.18%
Net income growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.08%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.15%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.18%
Share count change of 4.18% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-2.13%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.