PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.21%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
216.39%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-72.55%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-76.58%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.94%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x MAXN's 3.39%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
24.83%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.98%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.40%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.35%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-34.98%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.52%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.37%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.83%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-601.58%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.98%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-95.09%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.81%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.57%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.69%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count change of 0.25% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.