PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-48.11%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-62.76%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.70%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.19%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-67.25%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth while MAXN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
128.20%
Other expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-43.53%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.75%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-88.81%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.77%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.96%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.00%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.48%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-115.88%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-507.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-101.39%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.89%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.54%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.54%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Share count change of 0.83% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-8.75%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.