PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.11%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.83%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
294.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 73.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
231.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 51.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-16.98%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth while MAXN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.13%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
54.35%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.46%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.21%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-313.72%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-247.35%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-262.81%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-204.60%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
110.40%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MAXN's 100.26%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-188.55%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.21%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-150.75%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.52%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.67%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.67%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.62%
Share count change of 0.62% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.62%
Diluted share change of 0.62% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.