PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.59%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.38%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
62.44%
Similar gross profit growth to MAXN's 73.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
34.70%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MAXN's 51.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-15.68%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-18.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.58%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.67%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.74%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.42%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.27%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Operating income growth below 50% of MAXN's 66.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 39.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-26.00%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.05%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 46.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
681.19%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.95%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.34%
Net margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 51.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.97%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.97%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.99%
Share count change of 5.99% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
5.99%
Diluted share change of 5.99% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.