PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.56%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.17%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-41.96%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-44.49%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.15%
R&D growth above 1.5x MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
46.11%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.17%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.84%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.87%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2175.47%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2085.00%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.69%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.08%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-195.86%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-181.78%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-169.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1468.30%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-198.26%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-185.26%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.16%
Diluted share change of 0.16% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.